| The
Miami Herald
Posted on Saturday,
April. 1, 2006
In My Opinion
Joe
Martinez's twists, turns fit for a circus
By Ana Menendez
amenendez@MiamiHerald.com
The Royal Hanneford Circus may be delighting the kids at the youth
fair, but for the latest in cutting-edge moral acrobatics, we turn
once more to the Miami-Dade County Commission.
Performing this week: Chairman Joe
Martinez, whose contortionist tricks are becoming the stuff of legend.
Martinez is building a 5,300-square-foot
dream home out in West Dade. Joe has apparently found a way to trim
the bill: Accept some free work from a few good friends, including
one who is a board member of the Latin Builders Association.
Some might take exception to Martinez
accepting any kind of gift from an industry that he is bound by
public duty to regulate. But under the rules the County Commission
has written for itself, it is apparently acceptable.
So, stop worrying. Joe gets to save
a few bucks, his benefactors get the warm feeling of helping the
needy, and no one gets hurt.
A FEW SAFETY `RULES'
The Miami Herald's Noaki Schwartz
reported this week that the ethics commission has given Martinez
permission to accept the free services from his friends Jorge Guerra
Sr., the head of Design Drywall Inc., and his son Jorge Guerra Jr.
so long as Martinez observes a few safety rules: First, he reports
the gift. Next, he promises (really, now, no crossing fingers!)
that he won't allow himself to be lobbied by LBA board member Guerra
Jr., while he's working on the project.
What if, after Martinez's house is
built, the LBA comes before the commission to ask for something?
No problem.
Last year the Office of the Inspector
General, in clearing the list of contractors working on the Martinez
house, noted that Joe was getting some free help lining up subcontractors,
obtaining quotes and doing the other kinds of things that people
pay general contractors thousands of dollars to handle.
''Would this ever present any kind
of conflict?'' Joe wondered. "I mean, we all live in homes,
most likely built by a developer. Does that mean all of us would
always have a conflict of interest.''
No, not always. Only when the work
is done for free.
But that's a naive and simplistic
answer in a town where ethics are an interpretative art.
So here's how a pro would parse it:
''Pursuant to County Code Section
2-11.1(e), a gift is defined as the transfer of anything of economic
value without adequate and lawful consideration,'' begins the opinion
that ethics commission head Robert Meyers wrote to Martinez.
"Concerning (Guerra Sr.'s) supervisory
role overseeing the construction of your house, his services should
be reported as a gift. Clearly, Mr. Guerra is providing a service
to you for which you would otherwise have to pay and this falls
within the meaning of a gift as defined by the County Code.''
That's the kind of clarity that wins
you all sorts of transfers of economic value.
CIRQUE DU ABRAMOFF
Friday, I spoke with Martinez, who
argued that his friends are actually doing valuable work for the
public by saving the commissioner from having to deal directly with
impressionable subcontractors and inspectors.
When I asked if he couldn't find
a general contractor who would actually accept payment for the work,
Martinez was shocked. ''Why would I find someone who I don't know,
who is not a friend, to build a home?'' Later his aide called to
clarify that the work the Guerras were doing was ''consulting,''
not "general contracting."
Martinez need not be so scrupulous
with definitions. Gifts, whether from consultants or contractors
or dancing lions, are generally fine under the county ethics rules.
Even those tokens of friendship that exceed $100 may be accepted
so long as the recipient reports them.
The rest of us can wallow in self-righteousness.
The political class long ago decamped to an alternate ethical reality,
a kind of Circus Abramoff where perceptions and moral dilemmas are
something to be managed.
|